Versobank AS v European Central Bank.
Linked as:
Extract
Versobank AS v European Central Bank.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- ClientEarth v European Commission.
- Abdulbasit Abdulrahim v Council of the European Union and European Commission.
- Bank Melli Iran v Council of the European Union.
- Appeal — Admissibility — Representation of a party before the Court — Power of attorney given to the lawyer — Power of attorney withdrawn by the liquidator of the appellant company — Further steps in the proceedings by the decision-making body of the appellant company — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation — Action for annulment before the General Court of the European Union — Admissibility — Whether the shareholders of the company whose authorisation has been withdrawn are directly concerned.
- Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions
