Vehicle Tech Ltd v Allied Irish Banks Plc and Others

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R (Wright and Others) v Secretary of State for Health and another
• Bank of Scotland v A Ltd and Others (Serious Fraud Office, interested party)

REFERS TO

• R v Steven William Montila and Others
• O v Revenue Commissioners
• Cahill v Sutton

[See more]

• Carmody v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Others

CONSIDERS

• Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act, 2001
• Constitution of Ireland 1937/Bunreacht na hÉireann
• Burns v Bank of Ireland

[See more]

• Bank of Scotland v A Ltd and Others (Serious Fraud Office, interested party)
• East Donegal Co-Operative Livestock Mart Ltd v Attorney General
• McIlvenna v Ferris and Green
• Namlooze Venootschap de Faam v The Dorset Manufacturing Company Ltd
• DPP v McHugh
• Whitecross Potatoes (International) Ltd v Coyle

CITES

• Cowan v Attorney General
• An Blascoad v Commissioner of Public Works
• Re Solicitors Act, 1954

APPLIES

• Blehein v Minister for Health
• Heaney v Ireland
• DK v Crowley

FOLLOWS

• O'Mahony v Melia
• Hortensius Ltd v Bishop

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2010] 10 JIC 0403
• [2012] 2 IR 131

AFFIRMED in

• Vehicle Tech Ltd v Commissioner of an Garda Siochana

CONSIDERED in

• Finnegan v District Judge Michael Walsh and Others

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Carmody v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Others
• DPP v McHugh
• Bank of Scotland v A Ltd and Others (Serious Fraud Office, interested party)
• Hortensius Ltd v Bishop



See all quotations

• Heaney v Ireland
• Whitecross Potatoes (International) Ltd v Coyle
• O v Revenue Commissioners
• Burns v Bank of Ireland
• An Blascoad v Commissioner of Public Works
• Blehein v Minister for Health
• Cahill v Sutton
• Cowan v Attorney General
• Bank of Scotland v A Ltd and Others (Serious Fraud Office, interested party)
• Between William Devaynes and Louisa his Wife, and Thomas Monsell (an Infant), Plaintiffs and Wm. Noble, Sam. Pepys Cockerell, Fred. Booth, Mary Devaynes. Elizabeth Smith, Lestock Wilson, John Morris, and Joseph Down, Defendants. and between Sir Thomas Baring, Bart., and Sir Frank Standish, Bart. (on behalf of themselves, and all other the Creditors of the partnership of William Devaynes, John Dawes, William Noble, Richard Henry Croft, and Richard Barwick, who shall come in and contribute, Company), Plaintiffs and the said william Noble, Samuel Pepys Cockerell. Frederick Booth, Lestock Wilson, John Morris, Joseph Dorien, Wm. Devaynes, and Louisa his Wife, Mary Devaynes, Elizabeth Smith, and Thomas Monsell, Defendants
• East Donegal Co-Operative Livestock Mart Ltd v Attorney General
• Re Solicitors Act, 1954
• McIlvenna v Ferris and Green
• O'Mahony v Melia
• Baring v Noble; Clayton's Case
• Namlooze Venootschap de Faam v The Dorset Manufacturing Company Ltd
• DK v Crowley
• Criminal Justice Act, 1994
• Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act, 2001
• R v Steven William Montila and Others
• R (Wright and Others) v Secretary of State for Health and another
• Omar Mohammed Othman v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
• Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
• People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council of the European Union.
• Proceeds of Crime Act, 1996
• Child Care Act, 1991
• Solicitors Act, 1954
• Federal Cases - North Georgia Finishing, Inc v. 8212 1121