The vanishing substance-procedure distinction in contemporary corporate litigation: an essay.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc
• Delaware - Berlin v. Emerald Partners
• Delaware - McMillan v. Intercargo Corp.
• Delaware - Aronson v. Lewis
• Delaware - Brehm v. Eisner



See all quotations

• Delaware - Malpiede v. Townson
• Delaware - Smith v. Van Gorkom
• New Jersey - Marshall v. Geo. M. Brewster & Son, Inc.
• Delaware - Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette
• Delaware - IN RE BHC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SHARE. LIT., No. C.A. 18209
• Delaware - Cheff v. Athlone Industries, Inc.
• Delaware - Lewis v. Aronson
• Delaware - In re Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation
• Delaware - Grimes v. Donald
• Delaware - Gentile v. Rossette
• Federal Cases - In re Silicon Graphics, Inc, 97-16204
• Delaware - Stone v. Ritter
• Pennsylvania - Com. v. Sanchez
• Federal Cases - Erie Co v. Tompkins
• Delaware - Levine v. Smith
• Delaware - Rales v. Blasband
• Federal Cases - Stadin v. Union Electric Company
• Federal Cases - BLUE CHIP STAMPS V. MANOR DRUG STORES
• Delaware - Grobow v. Perot
• Federal Cases - Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed. 2d 929
• Delaware - Scattered Corp. v. Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.
• Delaware - Emerald Partners v. Berlin
• Delaware - Emerald Partners v. Berlin
• Delaware - In re J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.