The Legal Status of the Ex Utero Embryo: Implications for Adoption Law

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 717 F.Supp. 421 (E.D.Va. 1989), Civ. A. 89-373, York v. Jones
• Federal Cases - 862 F.Supp. 1421 (D.Md. 1994), Civ. PJM 94-1703, Doe v. Shalala
• Federal Cases - 7 F.Supp.2d 737 (E.D.Va. 1998), Civ. A. 297CV1167, Doe v. Irvine Scientific Sales Co., Inc.
• Federal Cases - 492 U.S. 490 (1989), 88-605, Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
• Federal Cases - 505 U.S. 833 (1992), Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 530 U.S. 914 (2000), 99-830, Stenberg v. Carhart
• Federal Cases - 274 U.S. 200 (1927), 292, Buck v. Bell
• Federal Cases - 316 U.S. 535 (1942), 782, Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson
• Federal Cases - 381 U.S. 479 (1965), 496, Griswold v. Connecticut
• Federal Cases - 405 U.S. 438 (1972), 70-17, Eisenstadt v. Baird
• Federal Cases - 410 U.S. 113 (1973), 70-18, Roe v. Wade
• Federal Cases - 431 U.S. 678 (1977), 75-443, Carey v. Population Services International
• Arizona - 698 P.2d 712 (Ariz. 1985), 17607, Summerfield v. Superior Court In and For Maricopa County
• Arizona - 121 P.3d 1256 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 2005), 1 CA-CV 04-0048, Jeter v. Mayo Clinic Arizona
• California - 80 Cal.App.4th 1050, B137002, Johnson v. Superior Court
• Iowa - 672 N.W.2d 768 (Iowa 2003), 03-0551, In re Marriage of Witten
• Massachusetts - 431 Mass. 150 (2000), A.Z. v. B.Z.
• New Jersey - 751 A.2d 613 (N.J.Super.A.D. 2000), J.B. v. M.B.
• New Jersey - 783 A.2d 707 (N.J. 2001), J.B. v. M.B.
• New York - 235 A.D.2d 150, 1997-07376, Kass v. Kass
• Tennessee - 842 S.W.2d 588 (Tenn. 1992), Davis v. Davis
• Texas - 193 S.W.3d 40 (Tex.App. - Houston [1st Dist.] 2006), 01-04-00541, Roman v. Roman
• Washington - 10 P.3d 1086 (Wash.App. Div. 2 2000), 24223-1, Litowitz v. Litowitz
• Washington - 48 P.3d 261 (Wash. 2002), 70413-9, Litowitz v. Litowitz