URQUHART v WALLACE [Royal Ct]

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Divorce Reform Act 1969
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970

DISTINGUISHES

• Sydenham v Sydenham
• Iverson v Iverson

REFERS TO

• Wachtel v Wachtel
• FITZGERALD v NORTHCROFT [Royal Ct]
• Harnett v Harnett

[See more]

• Cuzner (formerly Underdown) v Underdown

CITED in

• Noel (Née Claydon) v Noel
• Laugee v Laugee
• Stanaway-Ivey v Overland

CONSIDERED in

• O’Brien (Née Du Val) v O’Brien (No. 2)
• J v H

REFERRED in

• Ostroumoff v Martland

COMMENTED in

• HOWARTH v McBRIDE

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1974] JJ 119

This document cites

• Cuzner (formerly Underdown) v Underdown
• Harnett v Harnett
• Wachtel v Wachtel
• FITZGERALD v NORTHCROFT [Royal Ct]
• Iverson v Iverson



See all quotations

• URQUHART v WALLACE [CA (Jersey)]
• Sydenham v Sydenham