How the professional judgment standard could undermine the validity of sexually violent predator laws.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 520 F.2d 931 (7th Cir. 1975), 74-1155, United States ex rel. Stachulak v. Coughlin
• Federal Cases - 233 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2000), 99-35015, Sharp v. Weston
• Federal Cases - 448 U.S. 242 (1980), 79-394, United States v. Ward
• Federal Cases - 457 U.S. 307 (1982), 80-1429, Youngberg v. Romeo
• Federal Cases - 478 U.S. 364 (1986), 85-5404, Allen v. Illinois



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 504 U.S. 71 (1992), 90-5844, Foucha v. Louisiana
• Federal Cases - 521 U.S. 346 (1997), 95-1649, Kansas v. Hendricks
• Federal Cases - 531 U.S. 250 (2001), 99-1185, Seling v. Young
• Federal Cases - 560 U.S. 126 (2010), 08-1224, United States v. Comstock
• Federal Cases - 386 U.S. 18 (1967), 95, Chapman v. California
• Federal Cases - 441 U.S. 418 (1979), 77-5992, Addington v. Texas
• Illinois - 481 N.E.2d 690 (Ill. 1985), 60184, People v. Allen
• Kansas - 912 P.2d 129 (Kan. 1996), 73039, Matter of Care and Treatment of Hendricks
• Missouri - 123 S.W.3d 170 (Mo.banc 2003), SC 85538, In re Care and Treatment of Norton