A v HM Treasury (Nos 1 &2)
Linked as:
Extract
A v HM Treasury (Nos 1 &2)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
- The Supreme Court Rules 2009
- Constitutional Reform Act 2005
- Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001
[See more]
RESUELVE RECURSO
APPLIES
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson
CITES
- Ullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (Nadezda Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- A v HM Treasury (Nos 1 &2)
[See more]
REFERRED in
- R v F and Another
- Secretary of State for the Home Department v BM
- R Wang Yam v Central Criminal Court Attorney General (Interested Party)
[See more]
CITED in
- R (Khaled) v Foreign & Commonwealth Office
- Windsor v Crown Prosecution Service
- LK v Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- R Bredenkamp v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
- R (Maftah and another) v Secretary of State for the Foreign Office and Commonwealth Affairs
- R (Youssef) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
- John Dominick James Mahon and Another v FBN Bank (UK) Ltd
- R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police and Others (Liberty and another intervening)
RELIED UPON in
- E3, N3 and ZA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- LLC Synesis v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs
DISTINGUISHED in
APPLIED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
This document cites
