Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Universal City Studios Productions Lllp and Others v British Telecommunications Plc
Linked as:
Extract
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Universal City Studios Productions Lllp and Others v British Telecommunications Plc
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- British Steel Corporation v Granada Television Ltd
- R and Others v Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport BPI (British Recorded Music Industry) Ltd and Others (Interested Parties)
- R (on the application of SL) v Westminster City Council
[See more]
REFERS TO
- Phonographic Performance Ltd v Maitra
- Hoover Plc v George Hulme (Stockport) Ltd
- Kaschke v Gray & Hilton
[See more]
CONSIDERS
FOLLOWS
APPLIES
- L'Oreal SA v Ebay International AG
- R and Others v Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport BPI (British Recorded Music Industry) Ltd and Others (Interested Parties)
- Cream Holdings Ltd and Others v Banerjee and another
CITES
COMMENTS
DISTINGUISHES
CITED in
- 1967 Ltd and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others
- Paramount Home Entertainment International Ltd & Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Others
- Paramount Home Entertainment International Ltd and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others
[See more]
REFERRED in
- Cartier International Ltd and Another v British Telecommunications Plc and Others
- Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (A company incorporated under the laws of Germany) v Premier Alloy Wheels (UK) Ltd
- The Football Association Premier League Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
- Dramatico Entertainment Ltd and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others
- Dramatico Entertainment Ltd and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others
CONSIDERED in
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Others v David Harris and Others
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Others v Sky UK Ltd and Others
- Sony Music Entertainment (Irl) Ltd and Others v UPC Communications Irl Ltd (No 1)
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
This document cites