Tuncok v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
Linked as:
Extract
Tuncok v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
DISTINGUISHES
REFERS TO
- Re Refugee Review Tribunal; ex parte Aala
- Project Blue Sky Inc. v Australian Broadcasting Authority
- Stead v State Government Insurance Commission
[See more]
CITES
- Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal
- Murray v Legal Service Commissioner
- Naff of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[See more]
COMMENTS
- Minister for Immigration Local Government and Ethnic Affairs v Taveli
- Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Palme
- Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v W157-00A
[See more]
FOLLOWS
- Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf
- Ayan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
- Dagli v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
- DZACD v Minister for Immigration and Another
- Ovens v Civil Aviation Safety Authority
- Godley v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Applicants M1015/2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
- Mehmet Ucar v Nylex Industrial Products Pty Ltd
FOLLOWED in
- Jones v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
- Nezovic v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2)
- George v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[See more]
APPLIED in
REFERRED in
APPEAL RESOLVED in
AFFIRMED in
This document cites
- Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf
- Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte S20-2002
- Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Palme
- Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg