Tortious interference and the law of contract: the case for specific performance revisited.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 784 F.2d 1133 (2nd Cir. 1986), 883, Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Co.
• Federal Cases - 802 F.2d 941 (7th Cir. 1986), 85-2622, Frandsen v. Jensen-Sundquist Agency, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 752 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir. 1985), 82-3059, State of La. ex rel. Guste v. M/V Testbank
• Federal Cases - 905 F.Supp. 898 (D.Kan. 1995), 94-4086, Curtis 1000, Inc. v. Pierce
• Federal Cases - 45 F.Supp.2d 1164 (D.Kan. 1999), 96-1336, Wichita Clinic, P.A. v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.



See all quotations

• California - 14 Cal.3d 815, 30400, Buckaloo v. Johnson
• California - 24 Cal.3d 799, 23983, J'Aire Corp. v. Gregory
• California - 116 Cal.App.3d 111, 18578, Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Inc. v. California Health Laboratories, Inc.
• California - 49 Cal.App.3d 365, 45140, Gold v. Los Angeles Democratic League
• Colorado - 284 P.2d 238 (Colo. 1955), 17558, Marvin v. Pueblo Dairymen's Co-op.
• Colorado - 484 P.2d 1230 (Colo. 1971), 23777, Larson v. American Nat. Bank of Denver
• Colorado - 690 P.2d 207 (Colo. 1984), 83SC19, Memorial Gardens, Inc. v. Olympian Sales & Management Consultants, Inc.
• Idaho - 678 P.2d 595 (Idaho App. 1984), 13649, McEnroe v. Morgan