Top Deck Holdings v Secretary of State for the Environment

Core Citations

CONSIDERED in

• The London Borough of Bromley Secretary of State for the Environment English Churches Housing Group Ltd
• Cadogan Holding Company v The Secretary of State for the Environment and Another
• Langton Homes Ltd (Claimant) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) Harborough District Council (2) (Defendants)

[See more]

• Newark & Sherwood District Council and Another v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another
• Between: Wickford Development Company Ltd and The Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and The Regions and UTTLESFORD District Council
• Eden Restaurants (Holborn) Ltd The Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions The Council of the City of Westminster
• R Brazil v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another
• Eclat Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (First Respondents) and Trafford Borough Council (Second Respondents)
• Robert Marsh v Secretary of State for the Environment and North Shropshire District Council
• Paul Alfred Whitcher v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another
• Christofis Christoforou v Secretary of State for the Environment and and Another
• Christofis Christoforou v Secretary of State for the Environment and and Another
• A & T Investments v Secretary of State for the Environmet and Another
• James Philip Cooper v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another
• R (Gosbee) v First Secretary of State
• Leslie Hudson Secretary of State for Wales Arfon Borough Council
• Eden Restaurants (Holborn) Ltd v The Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another
• Putney Bridge Approach Ltd v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
• John Ashley HANN v (1) The Secretary of State for Local Government Transport and The Regions (2) SEDGEMOOR District Council
• John Derrick Penfold Brit Susan Small Secretary of State for the Environment Mid Devon District Council
• Roger LETHEM v Secretary of State and WORCESTER City Council
• North Yorkshire County Council v Secretary of State for the Environment and and Another
• Pratt Developments v Secretary of State for the Environment and and Another
• Leeds City Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
• Ayres, R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and Local Regions and Another
• Harris v First Secretary of State and Others
• Pelham Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and and Another
• Gladman Developments Ltd v 1) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another Campaign to Protect Rural England (Kent Branch) (Interested Party)
• Mr and Mrs B Andrews v The Secretary of State for The Environment, Transport and Another
• Hughes v Secretary of State for the Environment and and Another
• Thorpe Hall Leisure Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
• National Anti-Vivisection Society v First Secretary of State
• Paul Brightwell v Secretary of State for the Environment (First Respondent) Broadland District Council (Second Respondent)
• North Wiltshire District Council v The Secretary of State for The Environment and Another
• Gladman Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
• Grace Bennett v Secretary of State for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs
• Georgiou v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Anor and Another
• Persimmon Homes (North West) Ltd (Applicant) Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and Regions (First Respondent) North Shropshire District Council (Second Respondent)
• The King (LW Zenith Ltd) v Secretary of State for Levelling UP, Housing and Communities

CITED in

• Howell v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1st Defendant) Waveney Borough Council (2nd Defendant) Stamford Renewables Ltd (3rd Defendant)

REFERRED in

• Grace Bennett v Secretary of State for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• JPL [1991] 961