The State v George Mootoosammy and Henry Budhoo

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Mancini v DPP
• R v John McGregor
• Ronald Richard Hunt

CITES

• Surujpaul v The Queen
• Department of Public Prosecutions v Shannon
• R v Golder

[See more]

• McGreevy v DPP
• Selby v Director of Public Prosecutions (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))
• R v Sparrow
• DPP v Walker

CITED in

• Harris (Melanson) and Joseph (Marvin) v R
• Martin (Frank) v The State
• Dorsett and Somersett v The State

[See more]

• Thomas (Lennox) v The State
• Ambrose v Boston
• Anand Mohan Kissoon and Rohan Singh v The State
• Abdool Salim Yasseen and Thomas v The State (No 2)
• Mathews (Wilfred) v The State
• Shazam Ibrahim and Surendranauth Chattergoon v The State
• Johnson (Mark) and Edwards (Jeffrey) v The State
• Rodney (Peter) v The State
• Rodrigues (Randolph) v The State
• The State v Alfred
• Andrew Stewart v R
• Melanson Harris Marvin Joseph Appellants v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1974) 22 WIR 83

CONSIDERED in

• Dorsett and another v The State
• Hewitt v R
• Orlando Lamont v R

[See more]

• Gray et Al v R
• Matthews v The State
• Khan and Others v The State
• R v Singh et Al
• R v Singh et Al
• Ali v The State
• Craig Dubidath v R
• R v Henrigues et Al
• Martin v The State
• Troy Barrett v R
• Rodrigues v The State

This document cites

• Department of Public Prosecutions v Shannon
• Selby v Director of Public Prosecutions (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))
• Mancini v DPP
• Ronald Richard Hunt
• R v Sparrow



See all quotations

• R v John McGregor
• McGreevy v DPP
• R v Golder
• DPP v Walker
• Surujpaul v The Queen