The Right Rev. Nathaniel Lord Bishop of Meath, and the Rev. James Alexander, Clerk, - Plaintiffs in Error; The Most Noble Charles, Marquis of Winchester, - Defendant in Error

Core Citations

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 4 Cl & Fin 445
• 7 ER 171

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• The Right Rev. Nathaniel Lord Bishop of Meath, and the Rev. James Alexander, Clerk, - Plaintiffs in Error; The Most Noble Charles, Marquis of Winchester, - Defendant in Error

CONSIDERED in

• JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd

This document cites

• Murgatroid v Law
• Carlisle v Whaley
• Higham, and Elizabeth his Wife, against Ridgway
• The King against The Bishop of Rochester and Sir Francis Clark
• The Lord Bishop of Meath, and James Alexander, Clerk, Plaintiffs in Error, v The Marquess of Winchester, Defendant in Error



See all quotations

• Edwards against Evans
• Hughes v Biddulph
• Doe, Lessee of Reece and Others, against Robson and Another
• Sir William Elvis Knight, against The Arch-bishop of York, Martin Taylor and Thomas Bishop, Clerks
• Newton v Berresford
• Fenwick v Reed
• Randolph, Clerk, v Gordon and Others
• Sir Nicholas Stiddar & Tilars Case
• Bertie v Beaumont
• Swinnerton v Marquis of Stafford
• Thomas Bullen, Appellant; The Rev. James Michel, Clerk, Respondent
• Earl, Clerk, v Lewis
• Bolton v The Corporation of Liverpool
• The Right Rev. Nathaniel Lord Bishop of Meath, and the Rev. James Alexander, Clerk, - Plaintiffs in Error; The Most Noble Charles, Marquis of Winchester, - Defendant in Error
• Sir William Stanhope v Roberts, Executor of Spinks
• Walter Radcliffe, Esq., - Appellant; Martha Fursman, - Respondent
• The Queen and The Bishop of Yorks Case
• Rigaut against Gallisard
• Weights and Measures Act 1495
• Trade, Severn Act 1503
• Crown Lands Act 1488