The Queen (on the application of Darsho Kaur) (Claimant / Appellant) v Institute of Legal Executives Appeal Tribunal and Another
Linked as:
Extract
The Queen (on the application of Darsho Kaur) (Claimant / Appellant) v Institute of Legal Executives Appeal Tribunal and Another
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Sellar v Highland Railway Company
- R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy
- Meerabux v Attorney General of Belize
[See more]
FOLLOWS
REFERS TO
- Re P (A Barrister) (2005)
- Director General of Fair Trading v Proprietary Association of Great Britain; Re Medicaments and Related Classes of Goods (No 2)
- R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate and Others, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 1)
RESUELVE RECURSO
APPLIES
- R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2)
- Porter v Magill
- R v Abdroikov
CITES
REVERSES
CONSIDERS
- William Dimes, - Appellant: The Proprietors of the Grand Junction Canal, T. E. Skidmore, A. Boham, and W. W. Martin, - Respondents
- Sadler v General Medical Council
- Legal Services Act 2007
[See more]
DISTINGUISHES
DISTINGUISHED in
CONSIDERED in
- R Henderson v General Teaching Council for England
- Naseem Suleman v General Optical Council
- Ramin Pouladian-kari v R
[See more]
REFERRED in
- Damian McCarthy v Bar Standards Board
- Hardip Singh v Rashed Yaqubi
- Jonathan Ullmer v Secretary of State for Education
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
This document cites
- Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
- Porter v Magill
- R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2)
- R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate and Others, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 1)
- Porter v Magill
