Extract
The Queen (on the application of Vip Communications Ltd ((in Liquidation))) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
REFERRED in
This document cites
-
Sutherland et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2003 BCCA 14
-
M.M. v. L.M., (2003) 184 B.C.A.C. 18 (CA)
-
Bernard v. Kent Institution, [2003] B.C.A.C. Uned. 6
-
Zell v. Zell, [2003] A.R. Uned. 5
-
Terminal City Club Tower v. Assessor of Area No. 9 - Vancouver, [2003] B.C.A.C. Uned. 132
See all quotations
-
Welsh Ministers v PJ
-
R v Secretary of State for Social Security, ex parte Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants ; R v Secretary of State for Social Security, ex parte B
-
Recall Support Services Ltd and Others (Claimants/Appellants) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
-
Willers v Joyce (No 2)
-
R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor
-
The Queen (on the Application of A) v The Secretary of State for Health NHS Blood and Transplant (Interested Party)
-
R v Brentwood Justices, ex parte Nicholls
-
Recall Support Services Ltd and Others v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
-
A-G v Conroy (1838)
-
Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006
-
European Communities Act 1972
-
Communications Act 2003
-
Telecommunications Act 1984
-
Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949
-
Wireless Telegraphy (Exemption) Regulations 1999
-
Willers v Joyce and Another (No 2)
-
R (Ingenious Media Holdings Plc and Another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
-
R (on the application of The Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor
-
Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive)
-
Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive)
-
Courts Act, 1981
