The next innocence project: shaken baby syndrome and the criminal courts.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 985 F.2d 1056 (11th Cir. 1993), 90-5958, United States v. Gaskell
• Federal Cases - 313 F.3d 997 (7th Cir. 2002), 02-1896, Edmunds v. Deppisch
• Federal Cases - 295 F.3d 408 (3rd Cir. 2002), 99-2030, Stecyk v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 365 F.3d 215 (3rd Cir. 2004), 02-2859, United States v. Mitchell
• Federal Cases - 437 F.3d 884 (9th Cir. 2006), 04-55831, Smith v. Mitchell



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 437 F.3d 890 (9th Cir. 2006), 03-55166, Chamber of Commerce of United States v. Lockyer
• Federal Cases - 453 F.3d 1203 (9th Cir. 2006), 04-55831, Smith v. Mitchell
• Federal Cases - 508 F.3d 1256 (9th Cir. 2007), 04-55831, Smith v. Patrick
• Federal Cases - 458 F.Supp.2d 198 (D.Del. 2006), Civ. 04-1507, LP Matthews LLC v. Bath & Body Works, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 509 U.S. 579 (1993), 92-102, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
• Federal Cases - 549 U.S. 70 (2006), 05-785, Carey v. Musladin
• Federal Cases - 443 U.S. 307 (1979), 78-5283, Jackson v. Virginia
• California - 94 Cal.App.4th 370, D034429, People v. Basuta
• Colorado - 74 P.3d 316 (Colo. 2003), 02SC152, People v. Martinez
• Georgia - 656 S.E.2d 796 (Ga. 2008), S07A1437, Moore v. State
• Massachusetts - 427 Mass. 659 (1998), Commonwealth v. Woodward
• Louisiana - 981 So.2d 819 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2008), 43,168, State v. Hollins
• Maryland - 811 A.2d 282 (Md. 2002), 101, Andrews v. State
• Federal Cases - 56 M.J. 20 (U.S.Armed Forces 2001), 33091, United States v. Dimberio
• Mississippi - 980 So.2d 351 (Miss.App. 2008), 2007-KA-01023, Middleton v. State
• New Hampshire - 766 A.2d 260 (N.H. 2000), 97-892, State v. Cort
• Nebraska - 662 N.W.2d 618 (Neb. 2003), S-02-751, State v. Leibhart
• Missouri - 250 S.W.3d 855 (Mo.App. S.D. 2008), 28335, State v. Hill
• New Mexico - 176 P.3d 1105 (N.M. 2008), 28,954, State v. Schoonmaker
• New York - 57 A.D.3d 571, 2008-09625, People v. Mora
• New York - 131 Misc.2d 138, Matter of Lou R.
• South Carolina - 412 S.E.2d 390 (S.C. 1991), 23524, State v. Lopez
• Pennsylvania - 918 A.2d 766 (Pa.Super. 2007), Commonwealth v. Hardy
• Utah - 152 P.3d 321 (Utah 2007), 20050131, State v. Hales
• Texas - 246 S.W.3d 690 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007), WR-49984-02, Ex parte Henderson
• Wisconsin - 142 N.W.2d 183 (Wis. 1966), Lock v. State
• Wisconsin - 598 N.W.2d 290 (Wis.App. 1998), 98-2171, State v. Edmunds
• Wisconsin - 746 N.W.2d 590 (Wis.App. 2008), 2007AP933, State v. Edmunds
• Wisconsin - 746 N.W.2d 599 (Wis.App. 2007), 2007AP919, State v. Rhodes
• Connecticut - 541 A.2d 96 (Conn. 1988), 13036, State v. McClary