The McCulloch theory of the Fourteenth Amendment: City of Boerne v. Flores and the original understanding of section 5.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 24 F.Cas. 337 (C.C.D.Md. 1867), 14,247, In re Turner
• Federal Cases - 73 F.3d 1352 (5th Cir. 1996), 95-50306, Flores v. City of Boerne, Tex.
• Federal Cases - 877 F.Supp. 355 (W.D.Tex. 1995), SA-94-CA-0421, Flores v. City of Boerne
• Federal Cases - 100 U.S. 339 (1880), Ex Parte Commonwealth Of Virginia
• Federal Cases - 478 U.S. 186 (1986), 85-140, Bowers v. Hardwick



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 494 U.S. 872 (1990), 88-1213, Employment Division, Department of
• Federal Cases - 514 U.S. 549 (1995), 93-1260, United State v. Lopez
• Federal Cases - 521 U.S. 507 (1997), 95-2074, City of Boerne v. Flores
• Federal Cases - 156 U.S. 1 (1895), 675, United States v. E. C. Knight Company
• Federal Cases - 198 U.S. 45 (1906), 292, Lochner v. New York
• Federal Cases - 109 U.S. 3 (1883), Civil Rights Cases
• Federal Cases - 247 U.S. 251 (1918), 704, Hammer v. Dagenhart
• Federal Cases - 75 U.S. 603 (1870), Hepburn v. Griswold
• Federal Cases - 79 U.S. 457 (1871), Legal Tender Cases
• Federal Cases - 374 U.S. 398 (1963), 526, Sherbert v. Verner
• Federal Cases - 383 U.S. 301 (1966), 22, South Carolina v. Katzenbach
• Federal Cases - 392 U.S. 409 (1968), 645, Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
• Federal Cases - 406 U.S. 205 (1972), 70-110, Wisconsin v. Yoder