The jury's rise as lie detector.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 57 F.3d 126 (1st Cir. 1995), 93-2141, United States v. Shay
• Federal Cases - 69 F.3d 663 (2nd Cir. 1995), 208, United States v. Kwong
• Federal Cases - 54 F. 301 (6th Cir. 1893), Horn v. Baltimore & O.R. Co.
• Federal Cases - 79 F. 740 (8th Cir. 1897), 833, Rhodes v. United States
• Federal Cases - 885 F.2d 1529 (11th Cir. 1989), 86-5335, United States v. Piccinonna



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 490 F.2d 907 (9th Cir. 1973), 72-3168, United States v. Barnard
• Federal Cases - 941 F.2d 598 (7th Cir. 1991), 90-1572, United States v. Benson
• Federal Cases - 953 F.2d 440 (8th Cir. 1992), 91-1124, Bachman v. Leapley
• Federal Cases - 104 F.3d 225 (9th Cir. 1997), 95-50492, United States v. Cordoba
• Federal Cases - 57 F.3d 428 (5th Cir. 1995), 94-20285, United States v. Posado
• Federal Cases - 897 F.Supp. 299 (W.D.La. 1995), Civ. A. 94-1998, Ulmer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
• Federal Cases - 895 F.Supp. 1354 (D.Ariz. 1995), CR 94-122, United States v. Crumby
• Federal Cases - 293 F. 1013 (D.D.C. 1923), 3968, Frye v. United States
• Federal Cases - 908 F.Supp. 877 (D.N.M. 1995), Crim. 94-197, United States v. Galbreth
• Federal Cases - 483 U.S. 107 (1987), 86-177, Tanner v. United States
• Federal Cases - 509 U.S. 579 (1993), 92-102, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
• Federal Cases - 520 U.S. 1227 (1997), 96-1462, Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal
• Federal Cases - 289 U.S. 466 (1933), 701, Quercia v. United States
• Federal Cases - 365 U.S. 570 (1961), 44, Ferguson v. Georgia
• Federal Cases - 380 U.S. 609 (1965), 202, Griffin v. California
• Federal Cases - 414 U.S. 141 (1973), 72-1148, Cupp v. Naughten
• Alabama - 410 So.2d 135 (Ala.Crim.App. 1981), 6 Div. 492, White v. State
• Alabama - 520 So.2d 179 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987), 1 Div. 470, Williams v. State
• California - 178 Cal. 616, L. A. 4583, Hanton v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.
• California - 60 Cal. 142, 10,674, People v. Morrow
• California - 33 Cal.3d 400, 22558, People v. Cook
• California - 44 Cal.3d 713, 23029, People v. Melton
• Georgia - 100 S.E. 365 (Ga. 1919), 1126, Estill v. Estill
• Georgia - 200 S.E. 243 (Ga. 1938), 12458, Lankford v. Holton
• Georgia - 28 S.E. 25 (Ga. 1897), Humphries v. State
• Georgia - 53 S.E. 1027 (Ga. 1906), Warrick v. State
• Georgia - 57 S.E. 1079 (Ga.App. 1907), 264, Williamson v. State
• Georgia - 99 S.E. 43 (Ga.App. 1919), 10286, Williams v. State
• Georgia - 182 S.E.2d 779 (Ga. 1971), 26508, Pass v. State
• Iowa - 44 N.W. 686 (Iowa 1890), Pence v. The Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.