The Jupiter (No. 3)

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• The Jupiter (No. 3)

CITES

• Russian Commercial & Industrial Bank v Le Comptoir D'escompte De Mulhouse and Westminster Bank, Ltd
• The Thetford
• The Skipsea

[See more]

• Owners of Steamship Australia v Owners of Steamship Nautilus; The Australia
• Admiralty Commissioners (The Radstock) v Owners of the SS Volute
• Davies v Mann
• British Columbia Electric Railway Company v Loach

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 3 ILR 136
• 16 Asp Mar Law Cas 491
• 27 LlLRep 28

[See more]

• 43 TLR 741
• [1927] P 250

REFERRED in

• Juan Ysmael & Company Inc. v Government of the Republic of Indonesia
• Owners of the Philippine Admiral v Wallem Shipping (Hong Kong) Ltd (The Philippine Admiral)
• Republic of India v India Steamship Company Ltd (No 2)

[See more]

• United States of America and Republic of France v Dollfus Mieg et Cie, S.A. and Bank of England
• Rahimtoola v Nizam of Hyderabad [England, House of Lords.]

CONSIDERED in

• Boru Hatlari IIe Petrol Tasima as (also known as Botas Petroleum Pipeline Corporation Ltd) v Tepe Insaat Sanayii as
• Larson Higgins v MT Tajin
• The Indian Endurance (No 2); Republic of India and Another v India Steamship Company Ltd

CITED in

• Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation and Others

This document cites

• Owners of Steamship Australia v Owners of Steamship Nautilus; The Australia
• Admiralty Commissioners (The Radstock) v Owners of the SS Volute
• Aksionairnoye Obschestvo A. M. Luther v Sagor & Company
• The Dora, The Annette
• The Thetford



See all quotations

• The "Martin of Norflok"- (McCrohan, Master)
• "Johan and Siegmund"-(Niegel)
• Russian Commercial & Industrial Bank v Le Comptoir D'escompte De Mulhouse and Westminster Bank, Ltd
• The Skipsea
• Davies v Mann
• British Columbia Electric Railway Company v Loach
• The Evangelistria (Note)
• Admiralty Court Act 1840