The Durham and Sunderland Railway Company, Thomas Emerson Forster, and Joseph Forster, against Walker

Core Citations

CITES

• Parish of Hanmore against The Parish of Ellesmere

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1842) 2 QB 940

REFERRED in

• St. Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocesan Board of Finance v Clark (No. 2)

CONSIDERED in

• Romain et Al v Homesites Ltd
• Western Australia v Ward; Attorney-General (Nt) v Ward;Ningarmara v Northern Territory;Ward v Crosswalk Pty Ltd

This document cites

• Alban v Brounsall
• The Marquis of Stafford against Coyney
• Doe on the Demise of James Douglas, and Frances, his Wife, against Elizabeth Lock
• Hewlins against Shippam
• Bird v Higginson



See all quotations

• Doe D. Warn v Frederick Horn, The Rev. Benjamin Kennicott, George Barras, and the Durham and Sunderland Railway Company
• Dand v Kingscote
• The Earl of Cardigan against Armitage
• Wickham v Hawker and Others
• Drewell against Towler
• Bird against Higginson
• Doe d. Wawn v Horn and Others
• Arlett v Ellis, Shefford, and Others
• Cowling v Higginson
• Lucas, Thompson, Davis, Bull, T. Lingham, and Eicke, v Nockells
• The Governor, Deputy Governor, Assistants, and Guardians of the Poor of the City of Bristol against Wait, Gardner, and Barnett
• Parish of Hanmore against The Parish of Ellesmere
• Burnett and Others, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Sir Robert Burnett, Deceased, against W. D. Lynch
• Bullen against Denning
• Lucas and Others v Nockelis