The Dilemma of Localism in an Era of Polarization.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 458 U.S. 457 (1982), 81-9, Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1
• Federal Cases - 478 U.S. 265 (1986), 85-499, Papasan v. Allain
• Federal Cases - 494 U.S. 872 (1990), 88-1213, Employment Division, Department of
• Federal Cases - 517 U.S. 620 (1996), 94-1039, Romer v. Evans
• Federal Cases - 572 U.S. 291 (2014), 12-682, Schuette v. Coalition To Defend Affirmative Action



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - __ U.S. __ (2015), 14-556, Obergefell v. Hodges
• Federal Cases - __ U.S. __ (2015), 13-1314, Ariz. State Legis. v. Ariz. Indep. Redistricting Comm'n
• Federal Cases - 207 U.S. 161 (1907), 264, Hunter v. Pittsburgh
• Federal Cases - 272 U.S. 365 (1926), 31, Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.
• Federal Cases - 406 U.S. 205 (1972), 70-110, Wisconsin v. Yoder
• California - 18 Cal.3d 582, 23222, Associated Home Builders etc., Inc. v. City of Livermore
• California - 4 Cal.4th 389, S021118, Johnson v. Bradley
• Colorado - 185 P.3d 161 (Colo. 2008), 07SA101, Town of Telluride v. San Miguel Valley Corp.
• New Jersey - 336 A.2d 713 (N.J. 1975), Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Mount Laurel Tp.
• New Jersey - 456 A.2d 390 (N.J. 1983), Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Mount Laurel Tp.
• Utah - 624 P.2d 1116 (Utah 1980), 16087, State v. Hutchinson
• Missouri - 514 S.W.3d 571 (Mo. 2017), SC95401, Cooperative Home Care, Inc. v. City of St. Louis
• Arizona - 399 P.3d 663 (Ariz. 2017), CV-16-0301-SA, State ex rel. Brnovich v. City of Tucson
• Federal Cases - 264 F.Supp.3d 744 (W.D.Tex. 2017), Civ. SA-17-CV-404-OLG, City of El Cenizo v. State
• Ohio - 90 N.E.3d 979 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. 2017), 105500, City of Cleveland v. State
• Ohio - 92 N.E.3d 397 (Ohio Comm. 2017), 17CV-2672, City of Bexley v. State
• Federal Cases - 890 F.3d 164 (5th Cir. 2018), 17-50762, City of El Cenizo, Texas v. Texas
• Federal Cases - 896 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2018), 17-11009, Lewis v. Governor of Alabama