The Coastal Property Boundary in California: Recommendations to Improve Determination of the Mean High Tide Line in Light of Sea-Level Rise.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 583 F.3d 1174 (9th Cir. 2009), 05-35802, United States v. Milner
• Federal Cases - 458 U.S. 419 (1982), 81-244, Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.
• Federal Cases - 505 U.S. 1003 (1992), 91-453, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
• Federal Cases - 146 U.S. 387 (1892), Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois
• Federal Cases - 276 U.S. 272 (1928), 199, Miller v. Schoene



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 296 U.S. 10 (1935), 34, Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los Angeles
• Federal Cases - 90 U.S. 46 (1874), St. Clair County v. Lovingston
• Federal Cases - 438 U.S. 104 (1978), 77-444, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City
• California - 173 Cal. 765, L. A. 3750, Strand Improvement Co. v. City of Long Beach
• California - 180 Cal. 83, S. F. 7743, City of Oakland v. Buteau
• California - 23 Cal.2d 170, 18349, Miramar Co. v. City of Santa Barbara
• California - 26 Cal.3d 515, 23686, City of Berkeley v. Superior Court
• California - 33 Cal.3d 419, 24368, National Audubon Society v. Superior Court
• California - 11 Cal.4th 50, S037729, State of Cal. ex rel. State Lands Com. v. Superior Court
• California - 63 Cal.App.2d 772, 11986, Carpenter v. City of Santa Monica
• California - 24 Cal.App.4th 1050, A061428, Littoral Development Co. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation etc. Com.
• California - 58 Cal.App.4th 1296, D026338, Scott v. City of Del Mar
• California - 60 Cal.App.4th 218, B105571, Lechuza Villas West v. California Coastal Com.
• Paris Agreement