That's (not) what she said: the case for expanding admission of prior inconsistent statements in New York criminal trials.
›
Linked as:Extract
That's (not) what she said: the case for expanding admission of prior inconsistent statements in New York criminal trials.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 302 F.2d 347 (2nd Cir. 1962), 188, United States v. Freeman
- Federal Cases - 329 F.2d 929 (2nd Cir. 1964), 296, United States v. De Sisto
- Federal Cases - 446 F.2d 194 (2nd Cir. 1971), 987, United States v. Cunningham
- Federal Cases - 620 F.2d 939 (2nd Cir. 1980), 497, United States v. DeLillo
- Federal Cases - 531 F.2d 183 (4th Cir. 1975), 74--2071, United States v. Morlang
