Text and time: a theory of testamentary obsolescence.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 929 F.2d 1318 (8th Cir. 1991), 90-1998, Whirlpool Corp. v. Ritter
• Federal Cases - 359 F.2d 235 (D.C. Cir. 1966), 19311, Luff v. Luff
• Federal Cases - 80 F.Supp. 293 (D.D.C. 1948), 71309, In re Lee's Estate
• Federal Cases - 499 U.S. 1 (1991), 89-1279, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Haslip
• Alabama - 947 So.2d 1045 (Ala. 2006), 1050143, Gray v. Gray



See all quotations

• Arizona - 160 P.3d 679 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 2007), 1 CA-CV 06-0383, In re Estate of Rodriguez
• California - 54 Cal.2d 234, 20122, In re Torregano's Estate
• California - 132 Cal.App.2d 81, 20331, Estate of Buchman
• California - 147 Cal.App.3d 590, 7655, Estate of Turkington
• California - 152 Cal.App.3d 70, 69284, Coughlin v. Board of Administration
• California - 233 Cal.App.3d 651, C009433, Estate of Reeves
• California - 122 Cal.App.4th 326, C045573, In re Estate of Jones
• California - 127 Cal.App.4th 1164, B173522, Estate of Davies
• California - 39 Cal.App.4th 1525, A069050, In re Estate of Hermon
• Iowa - 286 N.W.2d 649 (Iowa 1979), 62314, Porter v. Porter
• Georgia - 553 S.E.2d 585 (Ga. 2001), S01A1007, Evans v. Palmour
• Georgia - 588 S.E.2d 248 (Ga.App. 2003), A03A1079, Walters v. Stewart
• Georgia - 602 S.E.2d 642 (Ga. 2004), S04G0291, Stewart v. Walters
• Kentucky - 28 Ky. 460 (Ky.App. 1831), Sneed v. Ewing
• Kansas - 220 P. 196 (Kan. 1923), 24,707 and 24,841, Aten v. Tobias
• Illinois - 21 N.E.2d 289 (Ill. 1939), 24915, Gartin v. Gartin
• Kansas - 457 P.2d 71 (Kan. 1969), 45382, In re Graves' Estate
• Indiana - 554 N.E.2d 8 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. 1990), 16A01-9002-CV-54, Oliver v. Estate of Oliver
• Illinois - 475 N.E.2d 1135 (Ill.App. 2 Dist. 1985), 84-384, Matter of Estate of Thompson
• Illinois - 499 N.E.2d 88 (Ill.App. 3 Dist. 1986), 3-86-0042, In re Estate of Pekol
• Illinois - 706 N.E.2d 1043 (Ill.App. 3 Dist. 1999), 3-98-0454, In re Estate of Forrest
• Kansas - 46 P.3d 1135 (Kan. 2002), 87,770, In re Estate of Keller
• Kansas - 77 P.3d 504 (Kan.App. 2003), 89,981, Offerman v. Rosile
• Kentucky - 23 S.W.2d 601 (Ky.App. 1930), Baldwin v. Cook
• Massachusetts - 325 Mass. 57 (1949), Hertrais v. Moore
• Massachusetts - 393 Mass. 754 (1985), Clymer v. Mayo
• Maryland - 365 A.2d 1004 (Md. 1976), 33, Davis v. Davis
• Maryland - 512 A.2d 389 (Md. 1986), 91, Ford v. Ford
• Minnesota - 119 N.W. 219 (Minn. 1909), 15,974, Donaldson v. Hall
• Michigan - 199 N.W. 686 (Mich. 1924), 58, In re McGraw's Estate