Teva UK Ltd v Merck & Company Inc.

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R (BV) v Licensing Authority
• Pozzoli v BDMO
• Johns-Manville Corporation's Patent

[See more]

• Actavis UK Ltd v Novartis AG
• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)
• Ratiopharm GmBh and another v Napp Pharmaceutical and another
• R (AH and Others (Sudan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening)
• Hallen Company v Brabantia (U.K.) Ltd
• Saint-Gobain PAM SA v Fusion Provida Ltd

CONSIDERED in

• Regen Lab SA v Estar Medical Ltd
• Actavis Group PTC EHF (a company incorporated under the laws of Iceland) and Another (Appellants in Appeal A3/2016/4110) (Respondents in Appeal A3/2016/4103) TEVA UK Ltd and Another (Appellants in Appeal A3/2016/4094) (Respondents in Appeal A3/2016/4103) Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) (Appellant in Appeal A3/2016/4104) (Respondents in Appeal A3/2016/4103) ICOS Corporation (a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington, USA) and Another (Respondents in Appeals A3/2016/4110, 4094, 4104) (Appellants in Appeal A3/2016/4103)
• Saint-Gobain Adfors S.A.S. (a company existing under the laws of France) v 3M Innovative Properties Company (a company existing under the laws of Delaware, United States)

[See more]

• KCI Licensing Inc. and iothers v Smith & Nephew Plc and Others
• Regen Lab SA v Estar Medical Ltd

REFERRED in

• Generics (UK) Ltd trading as Mylan v Warner-Lambert Company LLC

This document cites

• R (AH and Others (Sudan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening)
• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)
• Ratiopharm GmBh and another v Napp Pharmaceutical and another
• R (BV) v Licensing Authority



See all quotations

• Actavis UK Ltd v Novartis AG
• Pozzoli v BDMO
• Saint-Gobain PAM SA v Fusion Provida Ltd
• Hallen Company v Brabantia (U.K.) Ltd
• Johns-Manville Corporation's Patent
• Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Conor Medsystems Inc.