Telesystem Intl Wireless Inc. v CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners LP

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Tritonia Ltd v Equity and Law Life Assurance Society

CITES

• Attorney General v Newspaper Publishing Plc
• London CC and London Tramways Company
• Pratt v Inman

[See more]

• Vipont v Butler
• Seaward v Paterson

APPLIES

• Stancomb v Trowbridge Urban Council
• Radford v Freeway Classics Ltd
• Heatons Transport (St. Helens) Ltd v TGWU (Interim Proceedings)

[See more]

• Attorney General for Tuvalu v Philatelic Distribution Corporation Ltd
• Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan
• Churchman v Joint Shop Stewards' Committee
• Con-Mech (Engineers) Ltd v AUEW
• Director General of Fair Trading v Buckland
• Re Supply of Ready Mixed Concrete (No 2)
• Guardians of West Ham Union v Churchwardens, Company, of St. Matthew, Bethnal Green

FOLLOWS

• Fairclough v Manchester Ship Canal Company
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Hoogstraten
• Steiner Products Ltd v Willy Steiner Ltd

CONSIDERED in

• Stewart (Hon. Gordon) v Senator Noel Sloley, Jr., Noel Sloley, Jr. and Sharon Sloley
• Re Saad Cayman Ltd
• Intertrust Corporate Services (Cayman) Ltd v Cayman Islands Monetary Authority

[See more]

• The Companies Law (2010 Revision) v and Saad Cayman Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Singularis Holdings Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investments Finance Company Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investment Company (No. 2) Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investment Company (No. 3) Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investment Company (No. 8) Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investment Company (No. 9) Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investment Company (No. 10) Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Cayman Ltd (in Official Liquidation)
• Between: Intertrust Corporate Services (Cayman) Ltd Appellant v Cayman Islands Monetary Authority Respondent
• The Companies Law (2010 Revision) v and Saad Cayman Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Singularis Holdings Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investments Finance Company Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investment Company (No. 2) Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investment Company (No. 3) Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investment Company (No. 8) Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investment Company (No. 9) Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Investment Company (No. 10) Ltd (in Official Liquidation) and Saad Cayman Ltd (in Official Liquidation)
• Part XVI of the Companies Law (2016 Revision) and Xingxuan Life Technology Ltd
• Afonso Henrique Alves Braga (in his capacity as Administrator) Plaintiff v 1. Equity Trust Company (Cayman) Ltd 2. CIBC Bank and Trust Company (Cayman) Ltd 3. Commerce Management Services Ltd 4. Commerce Corporate Services Ltd 5. Commerce Advisory Services Ltd Defendants 1. Arnage Holdings Ltd 2. Brooklands Holdings Ltd 3. Securinvest Holdings S.A. 4. Banco Rural S.A. 5. Katia Rabello Applicants

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2002] CILR 96

CITED in

• Braga v Equity Trust Company
• Demarco Almeida v Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd

This document cites

• Heatons Transport (St. Helens) Ltd v TGWU (Interim Proceedings)
• Heatons Transport (St. Helens) Ltd v TGWU (Interim Proceedings)
• Tritonia Ltd v Equity and Law Life Assurance Society
• Re Supply of Ready Mixed Concrete (No 2)
• Attorney General v Newspaper Publishing Plc



See all quotations

• Attorney General for Tuvalu v Philatelic Distribution Corporation Ltd
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Hoogstraten
• Radford v Freeway Classics Ltd
• Seaward v Paterson
• Fairclough v Manchester Ship Canal Company
• Re Tuck. Murch v Loosemore
• Stancomb v Trowbridge Urban Council
• Director General of Fair Trading v Buckland
• Steiner Products Ltd v Willy Steiner Ltd
• Telesystem Intl Wireless Inc. v CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners LP
• Churchman v Joint Shop Stewards' Committee
• London CC and London Tramways Company
• Pratt v Inman
• Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan
• Vipont v Butler
• Scriven v Jescott (Leeds) Ltd
• Guardians of West Ham Union v Churchwardens, Company, of St. Matthew, Bethnal Green
• Con-Mech (Engineers) Ltd v AUEW