Tan Soo Leng David v Wee, Satku & Kumar Pte Ltd and Another

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Vienit Ltd v W. Williams & Son (Bread Street) Ltd

REFERS TO

• Worthing Corporation v Heather
• Wright v Dean
• Bickel v Courtenay Investments (Nominees) Ltd

[See more]

• Lipmans Wallpaper Ltd v Mason & Hodghton Ltd
• Mountford v Scott
• Theodorou v Bloom

FOLLOWS

• Dyson v Attorney General
• Barrow v Isaacs
• Eastern Telegraph Company v Dent

[See more]

• Lehmann v McArthur
• London and South Western Railway Company v Gomm
• Tulk v Moxhay

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1993] SGHC 30
• [1993] 2 SLR 126

REFERRED in

• Tan Soo Leng David v Wee Satku & Kumar Pte Ltd and Another

This document cites

• Mountford v Scott
• Eastern Telegraph Company v Dent
• Barrow v Isaacs
• Tulk v Moxhay
• Dyson v Attorney General



See all quotations

• Vienit Ltd v W. Williams & Son (Bread Street) Ltd
• Lipmans Wallpaper Ltd v Mason & Hodghton Ltd
• Worthing Corporation v Heather
• Wright v Dean
• Theodorou v Bloom
• Bickel v Courtenay Investments (Nominees) Ltd
• London and South Western Railway Company v Gomm
• Lehmann v McArthur