Tan Cheng Kwee v Public Prosecutor

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• James & Son Ltd v Smee
• Ross Hillman Ltd v Bond

REFERS TO

• Sopp v Long
• Reynolds v G. H. Austin & Sons Ltd

FOLLOWS

• Sweet v Parsley
• Shave v Rosner
• Lim Chin Aik v The Queen

[See more]

• Public Prosecutor v Phua Keng Tong Public Prosecutor v Frederick Tan Im Kian Frederick Tan Im Kian v Public Prosecutor

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2002] SGHC 118
• [2002] 3 SLR 390

FOLLOWED in

• PP v Yue Mun Yew Gary
• Chng Wei Meng v Public Prosecutor
• Comfort Management Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor

REFERRED in

• Chua Chye Tiong v Public Prosecutor

This document cites

• Alphacell Ltd v Woodward
• Houston v Buchanan
• Sweet v Parsley
• Lim Chin Aik v R
• Sopp v Long



See all quotations

• Lim Chin Aik v The Queen
• Lovelace v DPP
• Shave v Rosner
• Reynolds v G. H. Austin & Sons Ltd
• Shave v Rosner
• Re Phillips and Gill
• Laird v Dobell
• Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v Attorney General of Hong Kong; Yee Chin Teo v Attorney General of Hong Kong; Chak Shing Mak v Attorney General of Hong Kong
• Sopp v Long
• Ross Hillman Ltd v Bond
• James & Son Ltd v Smee
• Public Prosecutor v Phua Keng Tong Public Prosecutor v Frederick Tan Im Kian Frederick Tan Im Kian v Public Prosecutor