Taczanowska (orse. Roth) v Taczanowski

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Scrimshire v Scrimshire
• Wolfenden v Wolfenden
• Middleton v Janverin, falsely calling herself Middleton Arches

[See more]

• Woolfenden v Woolfenden
• The Queen, - Plaintiff in Error; George Millis, - Defendant in Error; and The Queen, - Plaintiff in Error; James Carroll, - Defendant in Error

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Taczanowska (orse. Roth) v Taczanowski

APPLIES

• Savenis v Savenis and Szmeck
• R v Millis
• Ruding v Smith

DISTINGUISHES

• Berthiaume v Dastous

CONSIDERS

• Polish Resettlement Act 1947 - Articles : S-9
• Allied Forces Act 1940 - Articles : S-1
• Foreign Marriage Act 1892 - Articles : S-1

[See more]

• Foreign Marriage Act 1892 - Articles : S-22
• Allied Forces Act 1940
• Polish Resettlement Act 1947

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1957] 2 All ER 563
• [1957] 3 WLR 141
• [1957] P 301

REFERRED in

• Collett v Collett

APPLIED in

• Preston (orse. Putynski) v Preston (orse. Putynska) (orse. Basinska)

AMPLIADA in

• Preston (orse. Putynski) v Preston (orse. Putynska) (orse. Basinska)

This document cites

• The Queen, - Plaintiff in Error; George Millis, - Defendant in Error; and The Queen, - Plaintiff in Error; James Carroll, - Defendant in Error
• Ruding v Smith
• Middleton v Janverin, falsely calling herself Middleton Arches
• Woolfenden v Woolfenden
• Savenis v Savenis and Szmeck



See all quotations

• R v Millis
• Scrimshire v Scrimshire
• Wolfenden v Wolfenden
• Berthiaume v Dastous
• Foreign Marriage Act 1892
• Allied Forces Act 1940
• Polish Resettlement Act 1947