Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Others v H.N. Norton & Company Ltd ; Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Others v Penn Pharmaceuticals Ltd and Others
• Synthon BV and SmithKline Beecham Plc (No.1)

[See more]

• BTH Company Ltd v Metropolitan Vickers Electrical Company Ltd
• Flour Oxidizing Company Ltd v Carr & Company Ltd

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)

CONSIDERS

• Patents Act 1977 - Articles : S-2
• Patents Act 1977

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2004] IP & T 42
• [2003] LS Law Pat 2
• 2003 RPC 43

CITED in

• Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd v Apotex Pty Ltd (No 3)
• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)

CONSIDERED in

• Smithkline Beecham Plc v Apotex Europe Ltd (No. 3)
• Smithkline Beecham Plc v Apotex Europe Ltd (No. 3)

FOLLOWED in

• Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Kennametal UK Ltd

REFERRED in

• Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd v Khek Tai Ting

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)

This document cites

• Synthon BV and SmithKline Beecham Plc (No.1)
• Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Others v H.N. Norton & Company Ltd ; Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Others v Penn Pharmaceuticals Ltd and Others
• The General Tire & Rubber Company v The Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Ltd and Others
• Flour Oxidizing Company Ltd v Carr & Company Ltd
• BTH Company Ltd v Metropolitan Vickers Electrical Company Ltd



See all quotations

• Patents Act 1977