Swinging at the Facts: How Baseball Informs Legal Argument

› ›

Author: Josephine (Jo) R. Potuto

Position: Potuto is the Richard H. Larson Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of Nebraska College of Law. This Article combines two areas of prime interest: writing and baseball. Potuto's book, Winning Appeals, discusses the elements of good writing and persuasive argument. She has taught the subject to law students and practicing lawyers. ...

Pages: 245-265

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

Swinging at the Facts: How Baseball Informs Legal Argument

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 470 U.S. 564 (1985), 83-1623, Anderson v. City of Bessemer
Federal Cases - 490 U.S. 488 (1989), 88-357, Maleng v. Cook
Federal Cases - 259 U.S. 200 (1922), 204, Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs
Federal Cases - 45 U.S. 646 (1846), Wilson v. Rousseau
Federal Cases - 346 U.S. 356 (1953), Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc.

See all quotations