Svanstrom v Jonasson

Core Citations

APPLIES

• Prudential Assurance Company Ltd (Respondents (Plaintiffs) v (1) Newman Industries Ltd, (Respondents (1st Defendants) (2) Alan Frank Bartlett and Others (Appellants (2nd & 3rd Defendants)
• Hooker Investments Pty v Email Ltd
• Edwards v Halliwell

DISTINGUISHES

• Bagshaw v The Eastern Union Railway Company
• Binney v Ince Hall Coal & Channel Company

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• The Great Western Railway Company v Rushout

CITES

• Foss v Harbottle

FOLLOWS

• Re Perkins. ex parte Mexican Santa Barbara Mining Company

CITED in

• Hannoun v R Ltd
• Majuro Investment Corporation v Timis & Others

CONSIDERED in

• Lansdowne v Matador
• Medley Opportunity v Fintan
• Medley Opportunity Fund Ltd Plaintff v 1. Fintan Master Fund, Ltd 2. Nautical Nominees Ltd Defendants

[See more]

• Medley Opportunity Funded Ltd Plaintiff v 1. Fintan Master Fund, Ltd 2. Nautical Nominees Ltd Defendants
• Swiss-Asia Genghis Hedge Fund (as assignee of Somers Nominees (Far East) Ltd) Plaintiff v Maoming Fund Defendant
• Re Lancelot Investors Fund, Ltd (in Official Liquidation) Hereinafter Referred to as the “Company”
• The Companies Act (2020 Revision) and 58.Com, Inc.
• The Companies Act (2020 Revision) and 58.Com, Inc.
• David Xiao Ying Gao v China Biologic Products Holdings, Inc.
• The Companies Act (2021 Revision) and Baf Latam Credit Fund
• Section 131 of the Companies Act (2021 Revision) (as Amended) and Companies Winding Up Rules (2018), Order 15 (as Revised) and Asia Momentum Fund (SPC) Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation)
• Kbc Investments Ltd Appellant v Geoffrey Varga as Official Liquidator of The Company Respondent
• The Companies Law (2007 Revision) and Lancelot Investors Fund, Ltd (in Official Liquidation) Hereinafter Referred to as the ‘Company’

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1997] CILR 192

This document cites

• Prudential Assurance Company Ltd (Respondents (Plaintiffs) v (1) Newman Industries Ltd, (Respondents (1st Defendants) (2) Alan Frank Bartlett and Others (Appellants (2nd & 3rd Defendants)
• Re Perkins. ex parte Mexican Santa Barbara Mining Company
• Hooker Investments Pty v Email Ltd
• Edwards v Halliwell
• Bagshaw v The Eastern Union Railway Company



See all quotations

• Schultz v Reynolds
• Foss v Harbottle
• The Great Western Railway Company v Rushout
• Binney v Ince Hall Coal & Channel Company