Strong & Company of Romsey v Woodifield
Linked as:
Extract
Strong & Company of Romsey v Woodifield
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
RESUELVE RECURSO
CONSIDERS
- Income Tax Act 1842 - Articles : S-C
- Income Tax Act 1842 - Articles : SCH-D
REFERRED in
- ALLIED NEWSPAPERS, Ltd v HINDSLEY (HM INSPECTOR of TAXES)
- Boarland (Inspector of Taxes) v Kramat Pulai Ltd
- Hughes v Bank of New Zealand
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Madad Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
- Bookers Central Services Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
- BG Lithographic Company Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
[See more]
CITED in
- Revenue and Customs Comrs v McLaren Racing Ltd
- Hanover Agencies Ltd v Income Tax Commissioner
- Rushden Heel Company, Ltd v Keene (Inspector of Taxes), Rushden Heel Company, Ltd v Inland Commissioners of Inland Revenue
[See more]
APPLIED in
- Fairrie v Hall (HM Inspector of Taxes)
- Smith's Potato Estates Ltd v Bolland
- Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Dowdall, O'Mahoney & Company Ltd
[See more]
DISTINGUISHED in
FOLLOWED in
- Kulim Rubber Plantations Ltd v Director-General of Inland Revenue
- Ampat Tin Dredging Ltd v Director General of Inland Revenue
REPORTED OPINION OF in
