Stewart v. BRB

This document cites

• Washington - Torrance v. King County
• Washington - Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings Bd.
• Washington - City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Bd.
• Washington - King County v. Washington State Boundary Review Bd. for King County
• Washington - King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Bd.



See all quotations

• US - Reference Stubs - Decisions to be consistent with growth management act
• US - Reference Stubs - Final orders
• US - Reference Stubs - Objectives of boundary review board
• US - Reference Stubs - Definitions
• US - Reference Stubs - Filing notice of proposed actions with board
• US - Reference Stubs - Limitation on new issues
• US - Reference Stubs - Who must plan-Summary of requirements-Resolution for partial planning-Development regulations must implement comprehensive plans-Tribal participation
• US - Reference Stubs - Annexations beyond urban growth areas prohibited
• US - Reference Stubs - Hearings-Notice-Record-Subpoenas-Decision of board-Appellate review
• US - Reference Stubs - Planning goals
• US - Reference Stubs - Comprehensive plans-Must be coordinated
• US - Reference Stubs - Countywide planning policies
• US - Reference Stubs - Growth management hearings board-Creation-Members
• US - Reference Stubs - Review of proposed actions by board-Procedure
• US - Reference Stubs - Comprehensive plans-Urban growth areas
• US - Reference Stubs - Natural resource lands and critical areas-Development regulations
• US - Reference Stubs - RCW 36.70A.170 Natural Resource Lands and Critical Areas-Designations