Stephen v Cooper

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Herbert v Samuel Fox & Company
• Inter Kellet & auter le Case fuit que un seisi de 3. acres per several feoffments

REFERS TO

• Barnes v Nunnery Colliery Company
• Herbert v Samuel Fox & Company
• Plumb (Pauper) v Cobden Flour Mills Company, Ltd

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Stephen v Cooper

AFFIRMS

• Stephen v Cooper

CONSIDERS

• Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company v Highley
• Workmen's Compensation Act 1925
• Workmen's Compensation Act 1906

[See more]

• Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 - Articles : S-7

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1929] UKHL J0422-2
• 45 TLR 413
• 1929 SC HL 85

[See more]

• [1929] AC 570

CITED in

• Seviour v Somerset Collieries, Ltd
• Henderson v Commissioner of Railways (Western Australia)
• Harris v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers Ltd

REFERRED in

• Scott v Seymour
• O'Rourke v Gunning [Supreme Court.]
• Noble v Southern Railway Company

[See more]

• R v Industrial Injuries Commissioner.ex parte Amalgamated Engineering Union (No. 2)

DISTINGUISHED in

• Thomas v Ocean Coal Company Ltd

This document cites

• Inter Kellet & auter le Case fuit que un seisi de 3. acres per several feoffments
• Herbert v Samuel Fox & Company
• Plumb (Pauper) v Cobden Flour Mills Company, Ltd
• Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company v Highley
• Stephen v Cooper



See all quotations

• Herbert v Samuel Fox & Company
• Barnes v Nunnery Colliery Company
• Workmen's Compensation Act 1906
• Workmen's Compensation Act 1923
• Workmen's Compensation Act 1925