State v. Lanier, 16592

This document cites

• California - People v. Ryan
• South Dakota - Gross v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.
• Federal Cases - Schmerber v. State of California, 658
• South Dakota - State v. King
• South Dakota - State v. Hartman



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - Breithaupt v. Abram
• Federal Cases - South Dakota v. Neville
• Federal Cases - Winston v. Lee
• South Dakota - State v. Hoenscheid
• Federal Cases - 1530 18 704 Toilet Goods Association v. Gardner Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner Gardner v. Toilet Goods Association, s. 336
• Federal Cases - Hammer v. Gross, s. 87-6682
• South Dakota - State v. Neville
• Federal Cases - Rochin v. People of California
• South Dakota - Bayer v. Johnson
• South Dakota - State v. Neville
• California - Carleton v. Superior Court
• US - Reference Stubs - Driving or control of vehicle prohibited with alcohol in blood or while under influence of alcohol, drug, or intoxicant
• US - Reference Stubs - Punishment for third offense-Revocation of driving privilege-Jail sentence for driving while privilege revoked-Limited driving privilege for certain purposes
• US - Reference Stubs - Blood test for impairment or intoxication in cases of death or serious bodily injury; right to use reasonable force
• US - Reference Stubs - Operation of vehicle as consent to withdrawal of bodily substances and chemical analysis-Submission to withdrawal or analysis following arrest
• US - Reference Stubs - Persons authorized to withdraw blood to determine alcohol content-Liability
• US - Reference Stubs - NRS 484.383 Implied Consent to Evidentiary Test; Exemption From Blood Test; Choice of Test; Circumstances In Which Police Officer May Direct Person to Submit to Blood Test; Restrictions On Requiring Urine Test; Failure to Submit to Test; Notification of Parent Or Guardian of Minor Directed to Submit to Test [Replaced]