Stanford International Bank ((in Liquidation)) (Acting by and through its Joint Liquidators, Marcus A. Wide and Hugh Dickson) Claimant v (1) Robert Allen Stanford (2) Andrea Stoelker (3) Stanford Development Company Ltd (4) Maiden Island Holdings Ltd (5) Gilberts Resort Development Holdings Umited (6) Stanford Hotel Properties Ltd Defendants Robert Allen Stanford (Being the Applicant in the Notice of Application filed 19 November 2012 disputing jurisdiction) Applicant v Stanford International Bank ((in Liquidation)) Respondent [ECSC]
Linked as:
Extract
Stanford International Bank ((in Liquidation)) (Acting by and through its Joint Liquidators, Marcus A. Wide and Hugh Dickson) Claimant v (1) Robert Allen Stanford (2) Andrea Stoelker (3) Stanford Development Company Ltd (4) Maiden Island Holdings Ltd (5) Gilberts Resort Development Holdings Umited (6) Stanford Hotel Properties Ltd Defendants Robert Allen Stanford (Being the Applicant in the Notice of Application filed 19 November 2012 disputing jurisdiction) Applicant v Stanford International Bank ((in Liquidation)) Respondent [ECSC]
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- John Glover port breve de Transg v John Andrew en que le Case fuit que le
- Tho. Buckenham, enfeofee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenus
- Anderton v Clwyd County Council; Bryant v Pech and Another; Dorgan v Home Office; Chambers v Southern Domestic Electrical Services Ltd; Cummins v Shell International Manning Services Ltd
CITES
This document cites
- ST Shipping & Transport Inc. v Vyzantio Shipping Ltd (The Byzantio)
- Cecil & others v Ehsanollah Bayat & others
- Anderton v Clwyd County Council; Bryant v Pech and Another; Dorgan v Home Office; Chambers v Southern Domestic Electrical Services Ltd; Cummins v Shell International Manning Services Ltd
- John Glover port breve de Transg v John Andrew en que le Case fuit que le
- Tho. Buckenham, enfeofee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenus
