Spite and extortion: a jurisdictional principle of abuse of property right.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 26 F.Cas. 360 (C.C.Pa. 1842), 15,383, United States v. Holmes
• Federal Cases - 195 U.S. 194 (1903), Aikens v. Wisconsin
• California - 102 Cal. 229, 21042, People v. Monaghan
• California - 141 Cal. 116, L. A. 967, Katz v. Walkinshaw
• California - 97 Cal.App.4th 1301, C038341, Wilson v. Handley



See all quotations

• Georgia - 13 S.E.2d 20 (Ga. 1941), 13545, Hornsby v. Smith
• Illinois - 415 N.E.2d 20 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. 1980), 80-2368, Brownstone Condominium Ass'n v. Geller
• Illinois - 415 N.E.2d 22 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. 1980), 80-313, People v. Fender
• Massachusetts - 146 Mass. 349 (1888), Rogers v. Elliott
• Kentucky - 24 S.W.2d 619 (Ky.App. 1929), Edwards v. Sims
• Kentucky - 96 S.W.2d 1028 (Ky.App. 1936), Edwards v. Lee's Adm'r
• Michigan - 29 Mich. 420 (Mich. 1874), Dumont v. Kellogg
• Michigan - 37 N.W. 838 (Mich. 1888), Burke v. Smith
• Michigan - 45 N.W. 381 (Mich. 1890), Flaherty v. Moran
• Michigan - 65 N.W. 275 (Mich. 1895), Kuzniak v. Kozminski
• Michigan - 500 N.W.2d 115 (Mich. 1993), 91958, Kratze v. Independent Order of Oddfellows, Garden City Lodge No. 11
• New Jersey - 428 A.2d 956 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1980), Slotoroff v. Nassau Associates
• Ohio - 42 N.E. 765 (Ohio 1896), Letts v. Kessler
• Wisconsin - 83 N.W. 308 (Wis. 1900), Metzger v. Hochrein