Space Investments Ltd v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Trust Company (Bahamas) Ltd et Al

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Re Hallett's Estate. Knatchbull v Hallett
• Little v Stevenson & Company
• Ex parte Taylor. Re Goldsmid

CONSIDERS

• Boyce v Edbrooke
• Ellis v Kerr
• Sinclair v Brougham

[See more]

• Ministry of Health v Simpson (sub nom Re Diplock, Diplock v Wintle)
• Shanahans Stamp Auctions Ltd v Farrelly and Another

CITES

• Between William Devaynes and Louisa his Wife, and Thomas Monsell (an Infant), Plaintiffs and Wm. Noble, Sam. Pepys Cockerell, Fred. Booth, Mary Devaynes. Elizabeth Smith, Lestock Wilson, John Morris, and Joseph Down, Defendants. and between Sir Thomas Baring, Bart., and Sir Frank Standish, Bart. (on behalf of themselves, and all other the Creditors of the partnership of William Devaynes, John Dawes, William Noble, Richard Henry Croft, and Richard Barwick, who shall come in and contribute, Company), Plaintiffs and the said william Noble, Samuel Pepys Cockerell. Frederick Booth, Lestock Wilson, John Morris, Joseph Dorien, Wm. Devaynes, and Louisa his Wife, Mary Devaynes, Elizabeth Smith, and Thomas Monsell, Defendants
• Ministry of Health v Simpson (sub nom Re Diplock, Diplock v Wintle)
• Foley v Hill and Others

[See more]

• Ministry of Health v Simpson (sub nom Re Diplock, Diplock v Wintle)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1981) 33 WIR 1

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Space Investments Ltd v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce et Al

REVERSED in

• Space Investments Ltd v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce et Al

This document cites

• Boyce v Edbrooke
• Between William Devaynes and Louisa his Wife, and Thomas Monsell (an Infant), Plaintiffs and Wm. Noble, Sam. Pepys Cockerell, Fred. Booth, Mary Devaynes. Elizabeth Smith, Lestock Wilson, John Morris, and Joseph Down, Defendants. and between Sir Thomas Baring, Bart., and Sir Frank Standish, Bart. (on behalf of themselves, and all other the Creditors of the partnership of William Devaynes, John Dawes, William Noble, Richard Henry Croft, and Richard Barwick, who shall come in and contribute, Company), Plaintiffs and the said william Noble, Samuel Pepys Cockerell. Frederick Booth, Lestock Wilson, John Morris, Joseph Dorien, Wm. Devaynes, and Louisa his Wife, Mary Devaynes, Elizabeth Smith, and Thomas Monsell, Defendants
• Ellis v Kerr
• Foley v Hill and Others
• Ministry of Health v Simpson (sub nom Re Diplock, Diplock v Wintle)



See all quotations

• Ministry of Health v Simpson (sub nom Re Diplock, Diplock v Wintle)
• Ex parte Taylor. Re Goldsmid
• Little v Stevenson & Company
• Shanahans Stamp Auctions Ltd v Farrelly and Another
• Re Hallett's Estate. Knatchbull v Hallett
• Ministry of Health v Simpson (sub nom Re Diplock, Diplock v Wintle)
• Sinclair v Brougham