Sonoco Products v. S.C. Dept. of Revenue

This document cites

• South Carolina - Beaufort County v. Trask
• South Carolina - Tovey v. City of Charleston
• South Carolina - Pinckney v. City of Beaufort
• Maine - City of Augusta v. Allen
• South Carolina - Unisun Ins. Co. v. Schmidt



See all quotations

• South Carolina - Sloan v. Sc Bd. of Physical Therapy ex'Mnrs
• South Carolina - Douglas v. Medical Investors, Inc.
• South Carolina - Broadhurst v. CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH ELECT.
• South Carolina - Mosteller v. County of Lexington
• South Carolina - Hodges v. Rainey
• South Carolina - ST. ANDREWS PUBLIC SERV. v. City Council
• South Carolina - ST. ANDREWS PSD v. City Council
• South Carolina - Hoogenboom v. City of Beaufort
• South Carolina - Kizer v. Clark
• Minnesota - Reiling v. City of Eagan, CX-03-249.
• South Carolina - Glaze v. Grooms
• South Carolina - Bryant v. City of Charleston
• US - Reference Stubs - Alternate methods where petition signed by all or seventy-five percent of landowners
• US - Reference Stubs - Prerequisites to issuance of corporate certificate to proposed municipality
• US - Reference Stubs - Home, corporate and branch offices; facilities
• US - Reference Stubs - Requirements for agricultural use
• US - Reference Stubs - Contiguous property defined
• US - Reference Stubs - S.C. Code § 12-43-220 Classifications Shall Be Equal and Uniform; Particular Classifications and Assessment Ratios; Procedures For Claiming Certain Classifications; Roll-Back Taxes