Soh Meiyun v PP

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Pp v Aob

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Van Damme Johannes v Public Prosecutor
• Juma'at bin Samad v Public Prosecutor

REFERS TO

• Hyde v Emery

CITES

• Public Prosecutor v Donohue Enilia
• Public Prosecutor v Lee Meow Sim Jenny

FOLLOWS

• Mohammad Zam bin Abdul Rashid v Public Prosecutor

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2014] SGHC 90
• [2014] 3 SLR 299

CITED in

• PP v Lim Choon Teck
• PP v Development 26 Pte Ltd
• The Royal Bank of Scotland NV v TT International Ltd

This document cites

• R. v. Einarson (K.), (2004) 184 O.A.C. 176 (CA)
• R v Daly
• R v Sargeant
• R v Davies (Reginald)
• Ladd v Marshall



See all quotations

• Hyde v Emery
• ADF v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Lee Meow Sim Jenny
• Pp v Aob
• Mohammad Zam bin Abdul Rashid v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Tan Fook Sum
• Van Damme Johannes v Public Prosecutor
• Juma'at bin Samad v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Donohue Enilia
• Penal Code 1871
• Criminal Procedure Code 2010