Smith, Hogg & Company v Bamberger & Sons

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Northmoor Steamship Company v Harland & Wolff, Ltd
• Rensfjell and Other Vessels
• Mowbray, Robinson and Company v Rosser

[See more]

• Palgrave, Brown & Son v Turid (Owners of S.S.)
• Maskell v Horner
• Wilson's Music and General Printing Company v Finsbury Borough Council
• Holman v Wade
• Brenda Steamship Company v Green
• Aktieselkab Helios v Ekman & Company
• Petersen v Freebody & Company
• The Nifa
• Falcke v Scottish Imperial Insurance Company
• Fletcher v Gillespie and Others

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 17 Asp Mar Law Cas 456
• [1928] 30 LlLRep 148
• 44 TLR 320

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Smith, Hogg & Company v Bamberger & Sons

CITED in

• Dampskip Selskab Svendborg v London Midland and Scottish Ry. Company

REFERRED in

• Dampskip Selskab Svendborg v London Midland and Scottish Ry. Company

This document cites

• Palgrave, Brown & Son v Turid (Owners of S.S.)
• Glasgow Navigation Company Ltd v Howard Brothers and Company
• Maskell v Horner
• Brenda Steamship Company v Green
• Petersen v Freebody & Company



See all quotations

• Aktieselkab Helios v Ekman & Company
• Rensfjell and Other Vessels
• The Nifa
• Rederi Aktiebolaget Acolus v W. N. Hillas and Company Ltd
• Fletcher v Gillespie and Others
• Wilson's Music and General Printing Company v Finsbury Borough Council
• The Nifa
• Holman v Wade
• Mowbray, Robinson and Company v Rosser
• Falcke v Scottish Imperial Insurance Company
• Northmoor Steamship Company v Harland & Wolff, Ltd