Sino Channel Asia Ltd v Dana Shipping and Trading Pte Singapore and Another

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Prince against Clark

REFERS TO

• The London Steam Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association Ltd v The Kingdom of Spain
• Lantic Sugar Ltd and Another v Baffin Investments Ltd
• Bernuth Lines v High Seas Shipping Ltd

APPLIES

• Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd

CITES

• AMB Generall Holding AG v Manches and Others
• AMB Generall Holding AG v Manches and Others
• London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Insurance Association Ltd v Spain and Another [QBD (Comm)]

[See more]

• Freeman & Lockyer (A Firm)(Plaintiffs) Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd and Shiv Kumar Kapoor (Defendants)
• Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan [SC]

CONSIDERS

• Arbitration Act 1996
• Arbitration Act 1996

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2016] All ER D 159 May
• [2016] 2 Lloyd's Rep 97
• [2016] 2 All ER Comm 384

[See more]

• [2016] Bus LR 778

CONSIDERED in

• Sino Channel Asia Ltd v Dana Shipping & Trading PTE Singapore and Another

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Sino Channel Asia Ltd v Dana Shipping & Trading PTE Singapore and Another

This document cites

• Lantic Sugar Ltd and Another v Baffin Investments Ltd
• London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Insurance Association Ltd v Spain and Another [QBD (Comm)]
• AMB Generall Holding AG v Manches and Others
• Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd
• Bernuth Lines v High Seas Shipping Ltd



See all quotations

• The London Steam Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association Ltd v The Kingdom of Spain
• Freeman & Lockyer (A Firm)(Plaintiffs) Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd and Shiv Kumar Kapoor (Defendants)
• AMB Generall Holding AG v Manches and Others
• Prince against Clark
• Arbitration Act 1996
• Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan [SC]