Sinclair-Jones v Kay

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Countrywide Properties v Moore
• Re F, (1984)

REFERS TO

• Re F (Wardship: Adoption)
• Mauroux v Soc. Com. Abel Pereira da Fonseca S.A.R.L.
• Myers v Elman

[See more]

• Orchard v South Eastern Electricity Board
• Davy-Chiesman v Davy-Chiesman
• Thew (R & T.) Ltd v Reeves (No. 2) (Note)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1988] 2 All ER 611
• [1989] 1 WLR 114

CONSIDERED in

• The Queen v The Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• Swedac Ltd v Magnet & Southern Plc (Defendants/Applicants)
• R v Horsham District Council and Another, ex parte Wenman

[See more]

• Skinner (Née Ball) v Myles, Public Health Committee and Bois Labesse
• Elsie Doreen Locke (Plaintiff) v Camberwell District and Another (Respondents

REFERRED in

• Sushma Lal v Secretary of state for the home department
• Wilkinson v Kenny
• Banks (John and Lynne) v Martin and Gill Geddis - Costs

[See more]

• Locke v Camberwell District Health Authority
• Microsoft Mobile OY (Ltd) v Sony Europe Ltd and Others
• Ridehalgh v Horsefield; Watson v Watson (Wasted Costs Orders)
• Langley v North West Water Authority

CITED in

• Locke v Camberwell District Health Authority

FOLLOWED in

• Gupta v Comer

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Holden & Company v Crown Prosecution Service

This document cites

• Re F (Wardship: Adoption)
• Davy-Chiesman v Davy-Chiesman
• Orchard v South Eastern Electricity Board
• Thew (R & T.) Ltd v Reeves (No. 2) (Note)
• Countrywide Properties v Moore



See all quotations

• Mauroux v Soc. Com. Abel Pereira da Fonseca S.A.R.L.
• Re F, (1984)
• Myers v Elman