Simic v R

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Attwood v R
• R v James Rowton
• Taylor v R

[See more]

• Hargan v R

CONSIDERS

• R v Cohen and Bateman (1909)

CITES

• R v Teitler
• Mraz v (No 1)
• R v Bliss Hill; R v Broadhurst (Mary); R v Meanley (Theresa)

[See more]

• R v Haddy

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 144 CLR 319
• 30 ALR 519

CONSIDERED in

• Mark James Graham v The Queen
• R v Szabo
• Priest, Alison Christine v Tasmania, State of [TASCCA]

[See more]

• FB v R
• Mwl v The Queen
• Kanbut v R
• R v Ian DACEY; R v Lee DACEY (No 2)
• Mann v R
• Pethybridge v R
• Cesan v The Queen
• Festa v R
• R v Brooks (No.5)
• Kalbasi v Western Australia
• Filippou v The Queen
• Dhanhoa v R
• Macdonald, Ian v R; Edward Obeid v R; Moses Obeid v R
• Batak v R
• Tkwj v R

AFFIRMED in

• Melbourne v R

CITED in

• Cleland v R
• Liberato v R
• Baini v The Queen

REFERRED in

• Braysich v The Queen

This document cites

• R v Teitler
• R v James Rowton
• R v Cohen and Bateman (1909)
• Taylor v R
• Hargan v R



See all quotations

• Mraz v (No 1)
• Attwood v R
• R v Haddy
• R v Bliss Hill; R v Broadhurst (Mary); R v Meanley (Theresa)