Shelley v Paddock

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Boissevain v Weil
• Dott v Brickvell

REFERS TO

• Shaw v Shaw
• Boissevain v Weil

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Shelley v Paddock

APPLIES

• Kiriri Cotton Company Ltd v Dewani

AFFIRMS

• Shelley v Paddock

CONSIDERS

• Holman v Johnson
• Exchange Control Act 1947 - Articles : S-5
• Exchange Control Act 1947 - Articles : S-7

APPLIED in

• Thackwell v Barclays Bank Plc

CITED in

• Ancien Maison Marcel Bauche S.A. v Woodhouse Drake and Carey (Sugar) Ltd

DISTINGUISHED in

• Salvesen v Simons
• Public Prosecutor v Intra Group (Holdings) Company Inc.

CONSIDERED in

• John Peter Silberman (Respondent (Plaintiff) v Coys of Kensington (Holdings) Ltd (trading as Coys of Kensington) (Appellant
• Thomas (Ralston) v United General Insurance Company Ltd/Advantage General Insurance Company Ltd
• Pampellone et Al v The Royal Bank Trust (Trinidad) Ltd

[See more]

• Tinsley v Milligan

REFERRED in

• Euro-Diam Ltd v Bathurst
• Re Cavalier Insurance Company Ltd
• Bumiputra (M) Finance Ltd v Datuk Syed Kechik bin Syed Mohamed

[See more]

• Andre Beaufrand Appellant v Simon Hughes De Pointes Respondent [ECSC]
• Vellino v Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
• Tinsley v Milligan
• Saunders v Edwards

FOLLOWED in

• Datuk Ong Kee Hui v Sinyium Anak Mutit

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1980] 1 All ER 1009
• [1980] 2 WLR 647
• [1980] QB 348

This document cites

---

• Shaw v Shaw
• Boissevain v Weil
• Kiriri Cotton Company Ltd v Dewani
• Shelley v Paddock
• Boissevain v Weil



See all quotations

• Dott v Brickvell
• Holman v Johnson
• Exchange Control Act 1947