Shavargo Mcphee v The Queen (Bahamas)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• DPP v Blake

CONSIDERS

• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
• Children and Young Persons Act 1933 - Articles : S-107
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

REFERS TO

• Ivor Rolle as Personal Representative of the Estate of Phillip Alexander Rolle Claimant v Attorney General Defendant [ECSC]

APPLIES

• Peart v The Queen

CITES

• R v Coutts (Graham James)
• R v Mushtaq (Ashfaq Ahmed)
• Alexander von Starck v The Queen

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• BS 2016 PC 4
• [2017] 1 CrAppR 10
• [23/12/2016] TLR 2

[See more]

• [2016] 4 WLR 166
• [2016] NR Uned 139

CONSIDERED in

• Atibon Campbell v The King
• Kevin Renaldo Collie v The Attorney General
• Stanford Pinder v The Director of Public Prosecutions

[See more]

• Attorney General v Johnny Mackey Armando Sargent; Armando Sargent v Director of Public Prosecutions; Johnny Mackey v Director of Public Prosecutions; Makaveli Tinker v Director of Public Prosecutions
• Bertram Clarke v R
• Tiano D'Haiti v R
• Indrick Tilme v R
• Tiano D'Haiti v R
• Atibon Campbell v The King

This document cites

• R v Coutts (Graham James)
• Alexander von Starck v The Queen
• Peart v The Queen
• DPP v Blake
• Ivor Rolle as Personal Representative of the Estate of Phillip Alexander Rolle Claimant v Attorney General Defendant [ECSC]



See all quotations

• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
• Children and Young Persons Act 1933
• R v Mushtaq (Ashfaq Ahmed)