Sharman Rosemond Claimant v (1) Police Constable Charles # 190 (2) Attorney General of Saint lucia (Sued Herein by Crown Proceedings Ordinance Chapter 13 of the Revised Laws of Saint Lucia) (3) DPP (4) His Worship The Honourable Mister Horace Fraser (5) Commissioner of Police (6) Superintendent of Prisons Defendants [ECSC]
Linked as:
Extract
Sharman Rosemond Claimant v (1) Police Constable Charles # 190 (2) Attorney General of Saint lucia (Sued Herein by Crown Proceedings Ordinance Chapter 13 of the Revised Laws of Saint Lucia) (3) DPP (4) His Worship The Honourable Mister Horace Fraser (5) Commissioner of Police (6) Superintendent of Prisons Defendants [ECSC]
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- En dett port per Eliz. Taw Execut de J. Taw, Company v William Bury, le Case fuit [DEL COMMON-BANK]
- Margaret Thorne que fuit le femme N. Thorne port breve de Dower v Richard
- William Hawtry port Action de dett envers Edward Aweher un des fits & heirs
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
- Attorney General of The Gambia v Momodou Jobe
- R v Spilsbury
- Bell v Director. of Public Prosecutions
[See more]
CITES
- Gordon Sandiford v DPP
- Krishendath Sinanan, Basdeo Sinanan, Pradaye Sinanan and Ramesh Sinanan v The State (No 1); Brann (Bunny) v The State; Ramsingh Jairam v The State; Kennedy (Rawle) v The State; Raffick Mohammed v The State
APPLIES
