SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria Srl contre Commission européenne.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF in

• SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria Srl contre Commission européenne.

This document cites

• Maria-Luise Lindorfer v Council of the European Union.
• Alfamicro - Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. v European Commission.
• European Commission v Keramag Keramische Werke GmbH and Others.
• Koinonia Tis Pliroforias Anoichti Stis Eidikes Anagkes - Isotis v European Commission.
• European Commission v ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias.



See all quotations

• Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE v European Commission.
• Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities v Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT) and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT).
• Masdar (UK) Ltd v Commission of the European Communities.
• Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)
• Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013)#Statements by the Commission
• Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 laying down the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in actions under the Seventh Framework Programme and for the dissemination of research results (2007-2013) (Text with EEA relevance)
• Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2016/C 202/01
• China Construction Bank Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
• Comisión Europea contra RQ.
• Gregor Schneider contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.
• ADR Center SpA v European Commission.
• Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 22 octobre 2020.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Clause compromissoire – Règlement (CE, Euratom) no 1605/2002 – Article 52 – Règlement (CE) no 2321/2002 – Décision no 1513/2002/CE – Convention de subvention – Projet Sensation – Sixième programme-cadre – Coûts éligibles – Conflit d’intérêts – Charge de la preuve – Relevés de temps de travail – Rapport d’audit – Valeur probatoire – Principe de bonne gestion financière – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-273/19 P.
• Treaty establishing the European Community
• Agence exécutive du Conseil européen de la recherche contre Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis.