Senat v Senat

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Evidence Act 1938 - Articles : S-1
• Evidence Act 1938 - Articles : S-2

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Stroud v Stroud (No. 2) (Practice Note)

REFERS TO

• Palmer v Maclear and McGrath
• Ginesi v Ginesi
• Fairman v Fairman

[See more]

• R v Whitehead
• Statham v Statham
• Galler v Galler
• Jones v Thomas
• Preston-Jones v Preston-Jones
• Burbury v Jackson
• Simmons against Simmons

FOLLOWS

• Thomas v Jones
• Wharam v Routledge

[See more]

• Gregory v Tavernor

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1965] 2 All ER 505
• [1965] 2 WLR 981
• [1965] P 172

CONSIDERED in

• The Director of Public Prosecutions v William James Sugden
• John Hrysikos v Debra Elaine Mansfield
• The Queen v Paul Janima

[See more]

• The Queen v Trevor David Vella
• Miller v Summary Court
• R v Sekhon (Malkiat Singh)
• Hamilton v Singh
• R v Edward Harvey
• Leopardstown Club Ltd v Templeville Developments Ltd
• Ramnath v Motor and General Insurance Company Ltd
• Clarke v Romero

APPLIED in

• R v Britton